{"id":2647,"date":"2017-04-20T10:00:31","date_gmt":"2017-04-20T07:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/playlab.uta.fi\/?p=2647"},"modified":"2017-04-20T10:00:31","modified_gmt":"2017-04-20T07:00:31","slug":"the-dark-side-of-e-sports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tuni.fi\/playlab\/the-dark-side-of-e-sports\/","title":{"rendered":"The Dark Side of E-Sports"},"content":{"rendered":"
What does a French intellectual born 100+ years ago think about League of Legends?<\/strong><\/h5>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Roger Caillois is one of the key theorists, alongside Johan Huizinga and Brian Sutton-Smith, who have had a significant and lasting influence within the field of game studies, despite their oeuvres pre-existing long before the video games they are often applied to. Caillois is best known here for his 1962 work <\/span>Man, Play and Games, <\/span><\/i>where he classified play into four separate forms: competition (ag\u00f5n), chance (alea), imitation (mimicry) and vertigo (ilinx), all existing on a continuum stretched from unregulated play (paidia) to rule-based games (ludus). His book warns against the \u2018rationalisation\u2019 of play, that the effect of play becoming more like work can be disastrous both for individuals and society at whole. Caillois uses as an example the gladiatorial games of Rome as evidence for the Roman Empire\u2019s <\/span>ag\u00f5n-alea<\/span><\/i> character; the games caused \u2018habits\u2019 and \u2018reflexes\u2019 representational of the empire\u2019s aggressive nature.<\/span><\/p>\n

This research connects Caillois ideas surrounding \u201cthe true perversion of ag\u00f5n\u201d with professional esports players. Esports continues to grow larger audiences, both through the ever increasing popularity of dedicated streaming sites like Twitch, as well as through traditional media such as the Finnish national broadcaster YLE. The visibility of professional players in our culture has no doubt helped influence a younger audience about the possibility of playing games for work, a \u2018dream\u2019 career. As mentioned in TL Taylor\u2019s 2012 book <\/span>Raising the Stakes<\/span><\/i>, these careers will only ever be attained by a small number, but the culture surrounding esports is nowadays pervasive and tied deeply to some gamers identity and lifestyle.<\/span><\/p>\n

Taylor rejects Caillois\u2019 perspective that work corrupts play, saying that \u201csuch a hard-line position is untenable\u201d when considering how pro players view their work\/play subjectively. However, the research suggests that this is overlooking the reasons why Caillois keeps a difference between work and play qualitatively, that is \u201cto critique the way in which working life <\/span>rationalises<\/span><\/i> play into a means of socio-political control.\u201d Personal autonomy is <\/span>constrained<\/span><\/i> when the economic obligation of work restricts the free activity of play. A lot of this relates to how playing for work is concerned primarily with the extrinsic rewards (tournament winnings, wages etc) as opposed to the intrinsic rewards (playing just for the sake of playing). External sources of control, such as the need for rent money, motivates extrinsic rewards and as such is linked with weak personal autonomy.<\/span><\/p>\n

The research uses the concept of Margaret Archers \u2018human reflexivity\u2019 to deal with the issues of agency and structure within social theory. \u00a0Specifically the modality of \u2018autonomous reflexivity\u2019 in Archer\u2019s model is used, in relation to Caillois\u2019 belief that the games of ag\u00f5n conformed people and cultures to instrumental rationality. It is stated that within our contemporary Western neoliberal societies, instrumental rationality is used by the populace to balance increasing demands on our time and money. The autonomous reflexive makes choices to navigate through these demands in \u201cthe most <\/span>practical <\/span><\/i>and <\/span>strategic <\/span><\/i>means possible\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

The socio-economic conditions that professional players exist in is further elaborated. Career anxiety is apparent in how players retire very young, often before thirty, without similar opportunities that traditional sports have for former players. Income, as determined by tournament winnings, is uncertain and of varying size. The small amount of players who reach the highest levels of competition is apparent, similarly to other \u2018dream\u2019 careers in music and film. Players in teams often live in shared houses, \u201cdesigned like factories\u201d that aim to minimise the distraction of family and friends for the benefit of extended training regimes. \u201cEveryday life becomes formulaic – a drive to \u2018min\/max\u2019 their human subjectivity\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n