The research shows how C\u00b2 and #LEGOSeriousPlay method help to learn more about #projectmanagement<\/p>\n
Silke Geithner and Daniela Menzel have studied how business simulation game called C\u00b2 (Camshaft-China) can help students to learn project management skills more effectively than by traditional academic teaching methods. The game\u2019s idea and the evaluation of the game is described in the article “Effectiveness of Learning Through Experience and Reflection in a Project Management Simulation” published in Simulation & Gaming Vol. 47(2) in 2016. C\u00b2 is based on a real life project which is modeled to the game. The case is that students need to decide about a site-location and factory setup of an automotive supplier in China. Playing happens live in a seminar room via face-to-face role-playing situations. It uses LEGO Serious Play (LSP) method, which\u2019s basic idea is to express your thoughts through hands-on modeling to other team members and monitor the landscape and factory ideas.<\/p>\n
In total, 47 students participated in one of six two-day game sessions. The single-team had about 6\u201313 players and they choose their roles themselves. They reported their skill level before and after the game. In the room, there were all the required materials but a manual about the project case was given beforehand. The game situations were observed by facilitators. Even though the situation focuses on developing the conceptual knowledge about project management there\u2019s also a chance to learn team working and participants\u2019 other soft skills. The writers emphasize the three categories for mixture of skills in project management: 1) organizational and management competencies, 2) project management or technical competencies and 3) human skills, soft skills or behavioral competencies. In LSP model creation of LEGO model is only one part of the process. More important point is the storytelling via building so it encourages reflection and discussion so the participants can build the collective shared model.<\/p>\n
Evaluation for the results had mixed method approach of quantitative and qualitative methods. The focus is in three mentioned skill sets and learner\u2019s satisfaction, lessons learned, longer-term learning outcomes and in overall evaluation of the C\u00b2 game. The results were really positive and students had learned a lot from their mistakes and found many ideas and suggestions for the future. They enjoyed the simulation and would recommend it to others. LEGO bricks helped the imagination and made possible to break routines. Weak points in the game were the time frame, missing information and how creativity was affected by challenging tasks. Simple guiding principles can be considered as key lessons learned about managing cross-functional projects. \u00a0For the future study the possible ways to continue is how previous experience and diversity of participants influence the play experience. But overall the game is well-suited for coaching processes with real-life project teams.<\/p>\n